Opinion
No. SC08-2331.
April 24, 2009.
Because petitioner has failed to show that the respondent has a ministerial duty to investigate the specified individuals, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000); see also Migliore v. City of Lauderhill, 415 So. 2d 62, 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982) (stating that mandamus "is [not] proper to mandate the doing (or undoing) of a discretionary act"), approved, 431 So. 2d 986 (Fla. 1983).
PARIENTE, LEWIS, POLSTON, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.