From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garvey v. Wegmans

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 4, 2018
5:18-CV-00255 (TJM/TWD) (N.D.N.Y. May. 4, 2018)

Opinion

5:18-CV-00255 (TJM/TWD)

05-04-2018

SHAUN P. GARVEY, Plaintiff, v. WEGMANS, ONONDAGA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, Defendants.


DECISION and ORDER

I. INTRODUCTION

This pro se action was referred to the Hon. Thérèse Wiley Dancks, United States Magistrate Judge, for initial review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e) and 1915A. No objections to Magistrate Judge Dancks' Order and Report-Recommendation [dkt. # 5] have been filed, and the time to do so has expired.

II. DISCUSSION

After examining the record, this Court has determined that the recommendations in the Order and Report-Recommendation are not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice.

III. CONCLUSION

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the recommendations in the Order and Report-Recommendation [dkt. # 5] for the reasons stated therein. Therefore, it is hereby

ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint (dkt. # 1) is DISMISSED on initial review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and § 1915A; and it is further

ORDERED that dismissal of Plaintiff's § 1983 claims is WITH PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND; and it is further

ORDERED that dismissal of Plaintiff's state law negligence and false arrest claims is WITHOUT PREJUDICE to refiling in state court because the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over these claims.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated.May 4, 2018

/s/_________

Thomas J. McAvoy

Senior, U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

Garvey v. Wegmans

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 4, 2018
5:18-CV-00255 (TJM/TWD) (N.D.N.Y. May. 4, 2018)
Case details for

Garvey v. Wegmans

Case Details

Full title:SHAUN P. GARVEY, Plaintiff, v. WEGMANS, ONONDAGA COUNTY SHERIFF'S…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: May 4, 2018

Citations

5:18-CV-00255 (TJM/TWD) (N.D.N.Y. May. 4, 2018)