Gartrell v. Theobold

2 Citing cases

  1. McKoy v. Hardy

    88 S.E.2d 708 (Ga. Ct. App. 1955)   Cited 5 times

    The refusal of the court to grant a continuance left the motion pending on the general grounds only and since no brief of the evidence was attached to the motion, the court did not err in dismissing the motion. Gartrell v. Theobold, 65 Ga. App. 161 ( 15 S.E.2d 470); Dollar v. Fred W. Amend Co., 58 Ga. App. 797, 798 ( 199 S.E. 845), and citations. The defendant's motion for damages for an appeal for delay only as provided for in Code ยง 6-1801 is denied.

  2. Daniel v. Atlanta Newspapers, Inc.

    81 S.E.2d 547 (Ga. Ct. App. 1954)   Cited 4 times

    The general grounds of a motion for new trial cannot be considered where there is no brief of evidence. Blount-Hudson Chevrolet Co. v. Blount, 55 Ga. App. 864 ( 191 S.E. 875); Gartrell v. Theobold, 65 Ga. App. 161 ( 15 S.E.2d 470); Siegel v. State, 79 Ga. App. 410 ( 53 S.E.2d 686); Foster v. Jones, 208 Ga. 320 ( 66 S.E.2d 743). The court did not err in dismissing the motion for new trial. 3. Error is assigned on the court's failure to certify exceptions pendente lite, excepting to the failure to allow an amendment to the motion for new trial.