From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garrow v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Dec 8, 2017
230 So. 3d 1279 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 5D17–242

12-08-2017

Nathan Lee GARROW, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and David M. Dixon, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and David M. Dixon, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Nathan Garrow (the defendant) appeals his judgment and sentences entered by the trial court after a jury found him guilty of operating a chop shop, conspiracy to commit dealing in stolen property, and four counts of dealing in stolen property. Finding no merit in the claims of error raised on appeal, we affirm. However, a scrivener's error appears on the last page of the defendant's sentencing documents where the following paragraph appears:

In imposing the above sentence, the court further recommends: CT 1 & 3 YEARS DOC F/B 2 YEARS COMMUNITY CONTROL–CTS 2,7,8,13 3 YEARS DOC F/B 2 YEARS COMMUNITY CONTROL FOLLOWED BY 5 YEARS OF PROBATION.

The paragraph should read: "CTS 1 & 4 3 YEARS...." Accordingly, we remand for correction of the defendant's sentencing documents.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED TO CORRECT SCRIVENER'S ERROR.

SAWAYA, PALMER and TORPY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Garrow v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Dec 8, 2017
230 So. 3d 1279 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
Case details for

Garrow v. State

Case Details

Full title:Nathan Lee GARROW, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Dec 8, 2017

Citations

230 So. 3d 1279 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)