From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garrison v. United States

United States District Court, Southern District of Georgia
Mar 25, 2022
Civil Action 4:20-cv-36 (S.D. Ga. Mar. 25, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 4:20-cv-36 4:18-cr-260

03-25-2022

BABY D. GARRISON, Movant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


ORDER

R. STAN BAKER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 8.) Movant Baby Garrison (“Garrison”) did not file Objections to the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court, GRANTS Respondent's Motion to Dismiss, and DENIES Garrison's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion and Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. The Court also DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to CLOSE this case and enter the appropriate judgment and DENIES Garrison in forma pauperis status on appeal and a Certificate of Appealability.

In fact, the Court's mailing was returned as undeliverable, with the notations: “Return to Sender, No. longer at this address, ” and “Return to Sender, Not Deliverable as Addressed, Unable to Forward.” (Doc. 9, p. 1.) Garrison's failure to notify the Court of any change in address provides another reason for dismissal. See Local R. 11.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Garrison v. United States

United States District Court, Southern District of Georgia
Mar 25, 2022
Civil Action 4:20-cv-36 (S.D. Ga. Mar. 25, 2022)
Case details for

Garrison v. United States

Case Details

Full title:BABY D. GARRISON, Movant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Georgia

Date published: Mar 25, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 4:20-cv-36 (S.D. Ga. Mar. 25, 2022)

Citing Cases

Garrison v. United States

in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2 (count 1). United States v. Garrison,…