From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garrison v. Otto

SUPREME COURT OF NEBRASKA
Feb 5, 2021
308 Neb. 372 (Neb. 2021)

Opinion

No. S-20-386.

02-05-2021

Margaret L. GARRISON, appellee, v. Logan M. OTTO II, appellant.

Edith T. Peebles, of Brodkey, Cuddigan, Peebles, Belmont & Line, L.L.P., Omaha, for appellant. Adam R. Little, of Ballew Hazen, P.C., L.L.O., Lincoln, for appellee.


Edith T. Peebles, of Brodkey, Cuddigan, Peebles, Belmont & Line, L.L.P., Omaha, for appellant.

Adam R. Little, of Ballew Hazen, P.C., L.L.O., Lincoln, for appellee.

Heavican, C.J., Miller-Lerman, Cassel, Stacy, Funke, Papik, and Freudenberg, JJ.

Per Curiam. This is an appeal of a domestic abuse protection order, which we moved to our docket. See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-1106(3) (Cum. Supp. 2018).

The court, having considered the oral arguments and having reviewed the record de novo, finds that the domestic abuse protection order entered by the trial court should be affirmed.

AFFIRMED .


Summaries of

Garrison v. Otto

SUPREME COURT OF NEBRASKA
Feb 5, 2021
308 Neb. 372 (Neb. 2021)
Case details for

Garrison v. Otto

Case Details

Full title:MARGARET L. GARRISON, APPELLEE, v. LOGAN M. OTTO II, APPELLANT.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF NEBRASKA

Date published: Feb 5, 2021

Citations

308 Neb. 372 (Neb. 2021)
953 N.W.2d 568

Citing Cases

Garrison v. Otto

In a two-paragraph opinion, we affirmed the district court's decision.Garrison v. Otto, 308 Neb. 372, 953…