From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garrison v. Does

United States District Court, E.D. Texas
Dec 16, 2024
6:24-cv-00192 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 16, 2024)

Opinion

6:24-cv-00192

12-16-2024

Curtis Allen Garrison, Plaintiff, v. Jane and John Does et al., Defendants.


ORDER

J. CAMPBELL BARKER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff Curtis Allen Garrison, a prisoner confined within the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) proceeding pro se, filed this civil-rights proceeding pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love.

On August 2, 2024, the magistrate judge issued a report recommending that plaintiff's lawsuit be dismissed, without prejudice, for his failure to comply with an order of the court and to prosecute his case. Doc. 10. A copy of this report was sent to plaintiff at his last-known address. Plaintiff, however, neither filed objections nor otherwise communicated with the court.

When there have been no timely objections to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the magistrate judge's report, and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommendation. Plaintiff's lawsuit is dismissed, without prejudice, for his failure to comply with an order of the court and to prosecute his case. Any pending motions are denied as moot.

So ordered


Summaries of

Garrison v. Does

United States District Court, E.D. Texas
Dec 16, 2024
6:24-cv-00192 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 16, 2024)
Case details for

Garrison v. Does

Case Details

Full title:Curtis Allen Garrison, Plaintiff, v. Jane and John Does et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas

Date published: Dec 16, 2024

Citations

6:24-cv-00192 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 16, 2024)