From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garris v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 7, 1989
541 So. 2d 1229 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 88-907.

February 7, 1989.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Bernard R. Jaffe and Herbert M. Klein, Judges.

Steven Lieberman and Robert C. Eber, Miami, for appellant.

Richard N. Blank, Ft. Lauderdale, for appellee.

Before NESBITT, FERGUSON and LEVY, JJ.


Appellee/Winn Dixie Stores, Inc. concedes, and we agree, that the trial court should have considered appellant/plaintiff's answers to interrogatories in ruling on the defendant's summary judgment motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.510(c). Those answers to interrogatories create genuine issues of material fact which should be resolved at trial.

We reverse the final summary judgment and final costs judgment entered in favor of Winn Dixie and remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings.


Summaries of

Garris v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 7, 1989
541 So. 2d 1229 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Garris v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PHYLIS GARRIS, APPELLANT, v. WINN DIXIE STORES, INC., APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Feb 7, 1989

Citations

541 So. 2d 1229 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

San Hueza v. National Found. Life Ins. Co.

Second, we cannot agree with the appellee that the plaintiff's answers to interrogatories, which so stated,…