From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garrido v. F&M Constr. & Dev. Corp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 18, 2022
21-cv-4084-MKV (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 18, 2022)

Opinion

21-cv-4084-MKV

07-18-2022

EFREN GARRIDO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. F&M CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT CORP. and FODIE M. KOITA, Defendants.


ORDER

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants will be permitted to offer at trial the materials produced between 8:17 p.m. on June 30, 2022 and 12:06 a.m. the next morning. Defendants will be precluded from offering any discovery that was not produced by 12:06 a.m. on July 1, 2022. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court is sanctioning the defense in the amount of Plaintiff's costs in bringing on the motion to compel production of the discovery [ECF No. 40]. The Court notes that the failure of the defense to produce any materials by the 5:00 p.m. deadline was compounded by the failure of the defense to communicate with the Court about the need for additional time, and these failures continued a months-long pattern of similar sanctionable conduct.

On June 30, 2022, the Court held a conference in this matter to address the “repeated failure” of defense counsel and Defendants “to heed the Court's orders and warnings” and produce discovery in this case [ECF No. 54]. At the conference, defense counsel represented that he would produce all outstanding discovery by the close of business that day. In an Order dated June 30, 202, the Court directed Defendants to produce the discovery materials by 5:00 p.m. on June 30, 2022 [ECF No. 58]. The Court stated that, if Defendants failed to comply, the Court would impose monetary sanctions, and Defendants would be precluded from offering at trial any materials that were not produced by the 5:00 p.m. deadline. As both parties acknowledge, Defendants produced the materials between 8:17 p.m. on June 30, 2022 and 12:06 a.m. the next morning [ECF Nos. 59-65, 66, 67]. Plaintiffs “submit that Defendants should be precluded from offering any” of the materials they produced, since it was all produced after the 5:00 p.m. deadline [ECF No. 66]. Defendants request that “the Court rescind its Order” and “allow the Defendants['] discovery responses to be admitted . . . at trial” [ECF No. 67].

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file a joint status letter by July 29, 2022. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the letter motion at docket entry 67.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Garrido v. F&M Constr. & Dev. Corp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 18, 2022
21-cv-4084-MKV (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 18, 2022)
Case details for

Garrido v. F&M Constr. & Dev. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:EFREN GARRIDO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jul 18, 2022

Citations

21-cv-4084-MKV (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 18, 2022)