From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garrett v. Day

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 28, 2021
2:21-cv-01627-JDP (PC) (E.D. Cal. Dec. 28, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-01627-JDP (PC)

12-28-2021

CAMEO LOREE GARRETT, Plaintiff, v. RENEE C. DAY, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PAY THE FILING FEE

JEREMY D. PETERSON, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

On November 8, 2021, I ordered plaintiff to submit, within thirty days, both a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis and a certified copy of her jail trust account statement. ECF No. 5. I warned her that failure to comply with that order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id. The deadline has passed, and plaintiff has not submitted a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis nor otherwise responded to the November 8 order.

Plaintiff previously submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 4. However, it was incomplete, largely unintelligible, and was not accompanied by a certified trust account statement. Accordingly, she was directed to submit a completed application and a certified copy of her trust account statement.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall randomly assign a United States District Judge to this case.

Further, it is RECOMMENDED that:

1. This action be dismissed for failure pay the filing fee; and

2. The Clerk of Court be directed to close the case.

I submit these findings and recommendations to the district judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 304 of the Local Rules of Practice for the United States District Court, Eastern District of California. The parties may, within 14 days of the service of the findings and recommendations, file written objections to the findings and recommendations with the court. Such objections should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.” The district judge will review the findings and recommendations under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Garrett v. Day

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 28, 2021
2:21-cv-01627-JDP (PC) (E.D. Cal. Dec. 28, 2021)
Case details for

Garrett v. Day

Case Details

Full title:CAMEO LOREE GARRETT, Plaintiff, v. RENEE C. DAY, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 28, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-01627-JDP (PC) (E.D. Cal. Dec. 28, 2021)