From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

GARR v. ZUPPAN

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eleventh District, Trumbull County
Apr 16, 2010
2010 Ohio 1715 (Ohio Ct. App. 2010)

Opinion

No. 2010-T-0035.

April 16, 2010.

Civil Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 2009 CV 02588.

Appeal dismissed.

Jeffrey A. Kurz, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

William P. McGuire, William P. McGuire Co., L.P.A., for Defendant-Appellant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


{¶ 1} On March 8, 2010, appellant, David Zuppan, by and through counsel, filed a notice of appeal from a February 8, 2010 judgment entry of the Trumbull County Court of Common Pleas.

{¶ 2} In the February 8 entry, the trial court denied appellant's motion to dismiss. In that entry, the trial court ordered appellee, Jeanette Garr, "to file a complaint with more definite notice pleading, wherein the theories of her complaint are more cogently pleaded." The trial court also included language that there "is no just reason for delay."

{¶ 3} For this court to have jurisdiction, the appealed judgment must be a final appealable order pursuant to R.C. 2505.02. We have held that the denial of a motion to dismiss a complaint is not a final appealable order. Sason v. Shepherd, 11th Dist. No. 2007-L-199, 2008-Ohio-173, 2008 Ohio App. LEXIS 145, at ¶ 3, citing Hill v. Home Roam Pools, 11th Dist. No. 2003-A-0097, 2003-Ohio-5862, 2003 Ohio App. LEXIS 5213, at ¶ 9; See, also, Ferrell v. Standard Oil Co. of Ohio (1984), 11 Ohio St.3d 169, 171. Furthermore, merely adding Civ. R. 54(B) language to an entry that is not final does not transform it into a final appealable order. Sason, supra, citing West v. Carfax, 11th Dist. No. 2005-T-0044, 2005-Ohio-3266, 2005 Ohio App. LEXIS 3009, at ¶ 2.

{¶ 4} Based upon the foregoing analysis, the trial court's judgment in the instant matter is not a final appealable order. Further, the inclusion of Civ. R. 54(B) language in the February 8, 2010 order does not finalize the non-final order. Thus, this court is without jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is hereby, sua sponte, dismissed for lack of a final appealable order.

{¶ 5} Appeal dismissed.

MARY JANE TRAPP, P.J., COLLEEN MARY OTOOLE, J., concur.


Summaries of

GARR v. ZUPPAN

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eleventh District, Trumbull County
Apr 16, 2010
2010 Ohio 1715 (Ohio Ct. App. 2010)
Case details for

GARR v. ZUPPAN

Case Details

Full title:Jeanette M. Garr, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Zuppan, Defendant-Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eleventh District, Trumbull County

Date published: Apr 16, 2010

Citations

2010 Ohio 1715 (Ohio Ct. App. 2010)