However, this Court previously affirmed the 10% award of the Agrifos assets, applying the well-settled rule that marital assets do not have to be divided equally ( Cotton v. Roedelbronn, 170 A.D.3d 595, 595–596, 97 N.Y.S.3d 28 [1st Dept. 2019], citing Arvantides v. Arvantides, 64 N.Y.2d 1033, 1034, 489 N.Y.S.2d 58, 478 N.E.2d 199 [1985] ). Plaintiff's attempt to relitigate this issue is unavailing and the conclusory allegations do not adequately state a claim for malpractice (seeGarr Silpe, P.C. v. Gorman, 192 A.D.3d 633, 141 N.Y.S.3d 310 [1st Dept. 2021] ; Olsen v. Smith, 187 A.D.3d 675, 675, 131 N.Y.S.3d 554 [1st Dept. 2020] ; Sitomer v. Goldweber Epstein, LLP, 139 A.D.3d 642, 643, 34 N.Y.S.3d 8 [1st Dept. 2016], lv denied 28 N.Y.3d 906, 2016 WL 6273493 [2016] ).