From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garnett v. Stuart

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION
Mar 8, 2013
Case No.: 3:12cv559/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Mar. 8, 2013)

Opinion

Case No.: 3:12cv559/MCR/EMT

03-08-2013

MARY ELAINE GARNETT, and ANTHONY JAMAINE MOORE, Plaintiffs, v. JAY STUART, Defendant.


ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated February 5, 2013 (doc. 6). Plaintiffs have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiffs' failure to comply with an order of the court.

_______________

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Garnett v. Stuart

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION
Mar 8, 2013
Case No.: 3:12cv559/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Mar. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Garnett v. Stuart

Case Details

Full title:MARY ELAINE GARNETT, and ANTHONY JAMAINE MOORE, Plaintiffs, v. JAY STUART…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION

Date published: Mar 8, 2013

Citations

Case No.: 3:12cv559/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Mar. 8, 2013)