From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garnes v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 10, 2016
144 A.D.3d 1277 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

11-10-2016

In the Matter of Aikio GARNES, Petitioner, v. ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Aikio Garnes, Attica, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.


Aikio Garnes, Attica, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a prison disciplinary determination. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. Although not mentioned by the Attorney General, the loss of good time incurred by petitioner as a result of the disciplinary determination should also be restored (see Matter of Zoccoli v. Annucci, 140 A.D.3d 1512, 1513, 33 N.Y.S.3d 768 [2016] ). Otherwise, as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the proceeding must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Clark v. New York State Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision, 138 A.D.3d 1331, 1332, 28 N.Y.S.3d 639 [2016] ; Matter of Corrieri v. Annucci, 137 A.D.3d 1407, 1408, 25 N.Y.S.3d 920 [2016] ).

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

McCARTHY, J.P., GARRY, LYNCH, ROSE and MULVEY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Garnes v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 10, 2016
144 A.D.3d 1277 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Garnes v. Annucci

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Aikio GARNES, Petitioner, v. ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 10, 2016

Citations

144 A.D.3d 1277 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
144 A.D.3d 1277
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 7359

Citing Cases

Worth v. Venettozzi

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively…

Hines v. Venettozzi

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively…