From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garner v. State

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Jul 19, 2017
NO. 09-15-00316-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 19, 2017)

Opinion

NO. 09-15-00316-CR

07-19-2017

TROY JAMARKUS GARNER, Appellant v. STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 258th District Court Polk County, Texas
Trial Cause No. 21199

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On January 11, 2010, Troy Jamarkus Garner was indicted for possession of a controlled substance, namely cocaine, in an amount less than one gram, a state jail felony. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.115(b) (West 2010).

Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, Garner pleaded guilty to the offense. On March 28, 2011, the trial court sentenced Garner to two years in state jail but suspended the sentence and placed Garner on community supervision for three years. On November 21, 2013, during the term of his community supervision, capias having been previously issued and executed upon Garner, the State filed their fourth amended second motion to revoke community supervision alleging that Garner had violated seven conditions of his community supervision. On August 12, 2015, Garner entered his plea of "not true" to all counts in the State's motion. After hearing all of the evidence at trial, the court found multiple alleged violations in the state's motion to be true, revoked Garner's community supervision, and sentenced him to two years in state jail. Garner timely filed a notice of appeal.

Garner's appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel's professional evaluation of the record and concludes the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). We granted an extension of time for Garner to file a pro se brief, but we received no response from him.

We have independently examined the entire appellate record in this matter, and we agree that no arguable issues support an appeal. We have determined that this appeal is wholly frivolous. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal. Cf. Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court's judgment.

Garner may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.

AFFIRMED.

/s/_________

CHARLES KREGER

Justice Submitted on August 8, 2016
Opinion Delivered July 19, 2017
Do not publish Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger, and Johnson, JJ.


Summaries of

Garner v. State

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Jul 19, 2017
NO. 09-15-00316-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 19, 2017)
Case details for

Garner v. State

Case Details

Full title:TROY JAMARKUS GARNER, Appellant v. STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

Date published: Jul 19, 2017

Citations

NO. 09-15-00316-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 19, 2017)