From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garner v. Pennsyvania

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jun 30, 2020
Civil Action No. 2: 16-cv-0223 (W.D. Pa. Jun. 30, 2020)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 2: 16-cv-0223

06-30-2020

KRISTOPHER EUGENE GARNER, Petitioner, v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYVANIA; THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA; DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY; and SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI FRACKVILLE, Respondents.

KRISTOPHER EUGENE GARNER JH0721 S.C.I Frackville 1111 Altamont Blvd Frackville, PA 17931 (via U.S. First Class Mail) Alicia H. Searfoss Office of the District Attorney (via CM/ECF electronic notification)


MEMORANDUM ORDER

Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of Chief United States Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy (ECF No. 22) recommending that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 5) be denied and that no certificate of appealability be issued. Petitioner was served with the Report and Recommendation at his listed address and was advised that he had until June 22, 2020, to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. To date, Petitioner has not filed any objections nor has he sought an extension of time in which to do so.

If a party does not file timely objections to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the party may lose its right to de novo review by the district court, although the court must still give "reasoned consideration" to the magistrate judge's report before adopting it. Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d 874, 878-79 (3d Cir. 1987). The district court should, as a matter of good practice, "satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation." Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b), advisory committee notes. --------

The Court has reviewed the matter and concludes that the Report and Recommendation correctly analyzes the issues and makes a sound recommendation. Upon consideration of the Petition and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, and after undertaking a de novo review of the record, and in the exercise of sound judicial discretion,

It is HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED and a Certificate of Appealability is also DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Chief Magistrate Judge, dated June 3, 2020, hereby is ADOPTED as the Opinion of the District Court.

The Clerk of Court is ORDERED to mark this case closed.

AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Petitioner has thirty (30) days to file a notice of appeal as provided by Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

SO ORDERED this 30th day of June, 2020.

s/Nora Barry Fischer

Nora Barry Fischer

Senior United States District Judge cc/ecf:

Honorable Cynthia Reed Eddy

Chief United States Magistrate Judge

KRISTOPHER EUGENE GARNER

JH0721

S.C.I Frackville

1111 Altamont Blvd

Frackville, PA 17931

(via U.S. First Class Mail)

Alicia H. Searfoss

Office of the District Attorney

(via CM/ECF electronic notification)


Summaries of

Garner v. Pennsyvania

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jun 30, 2020
Civil Action No. 2: 16-cv-0223 (W.D. Pa. Jun. 30, 2020)
Case details for

Garner v. Pennsyvania

Case Details

Full title:KRISTOPHER EUGENE GARNER, Petitioner, v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYVANIA; THE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jun 30, 2020

Citations

Civil Action No. 2: 16-cv-0223 (W.D. Pa. Jun. 30, 2020)