Garner v. Harry

1 Citing case

  1. Stow v. Warden

    Case No. 21-cv-156-JL (D.N.H. Jun. 15, 2021)   Cited 1 times

    A § 2254 petition is legally insufficient when it is based on state law rather than federal law. Wilson v. Corcoran, 562 U.S. 1, 16 (2010) (“But it is only noncompliance with federal law that renders a State's criminal judgment susceptible to collateral attack in the federal courts.”); see also Spencer v. Pollard, 19-cv-561, 2019 WL 3281627, at *2 (E.D. Wis. June 21, 2019); Haney v. Muniz, LA CV 17-05040VBF-JC, 2017 WL 3326448, at *1 (C.D. Cal. August 2, 2017); Garner v. Harry, 09-cv-656, 2009 WL 2370781, at *5 (W.D. Mich. July 30, 2009). Stow's motion asking the court to overturn the New Hampshire Supreme Court's decision in In re Warden (document no. 15) is similarly baseless.