From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garmany v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 11, 2023
1:23-cv-00607-HBK (E.D. Cal. May. 11, 2023)

Opinion

1:23-cv-00607-HBK

05-11-2023

SPRING RAY GARMANY, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND DIRECTING CLERK TO ISSUE SCHEDULING ORDER (DOC. NO. 2)

HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 in this Social Security appeal. (Doc. No. 2). Plaintiff's declarations in the motion satisfies the requirements under § 1915.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 2) is GRANTED.

2. The Clerk is directed to issue the Scheduling Order and summons. Service shall proceed under the Court's E-Service program set forth in the Scheduling Order.


Summaries of

Garmany v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 11, 2023
1:23-cv-00607-HBK (E.D. Cal. May. 11, 2023)
Case details for

Garmany v. Kijakazi

Case Details

Full title:SPRING RAY GARMANY, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: May 11, 2023

Citations

1:23-cv-00607-HBK (E.D. Cal. May. 11, 2023)