From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garman Group v. University Pipeline, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Nevada
May 16, 2011
Case No. 2:11-cv-00184-RLH-PAL (D. Nev. May. 16, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-cv-00184-RLH-PAL.

May 16, 2011


ORDER (Mot for Recog of Svc — Dkt. #21)


The court conducted a hearing on May 12, 2011, on Plaintiffs' Motion for Recognition of Service on University Pipeline, Inc. and Tom Unger, or in the Alternative, Motion to Enlarge Time for Service (Dkt. #21). Kenneth Hogan was present on behalf of the Plaintiffs. Barney Ales was present on behalf of Defendant Tom Unger. The court reviewed the Motion, Defendant Tom Unger's Statement of Non-Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Recognition of Service (Dkt. #23), and heard arguments of counsel. Although counsel for the Plaintiffs believes the corporate Defendant has been appropriately served he requested a 90 day extension in an abundance of caution. For good cause appearing,

IT IS ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's Motion to Enlarge Time for Service (Dkt. #21) is GRANTED.
2. Plaintiffs shall have an additional 90 days from the date of the hearing, or until August 10, 2011, in which to serve Defendant University Pipeline, Inc.

Dated this 12th day of May, 2011.


Summaries of

Garman Group v. University Pipeline, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Nevada
May 16, 2011
Case No. 2:11-cv-00184-RLH-PAL (D. Nev. May. 16, 2011)
Case details for

Garman Group v. University Pipeline, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GARMAN GROUP, LLC, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNIVERSITY PIPELINE, INC., et…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: May 16, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:11-cv-00184-RLH-PAL (D. Nev. May. 16, 2011)