From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garlock v. New York Central and Hud. Riv. R.R. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 1, 1902
68 App. Div. 651 (N.Y. App. Div. 1902)

Opinion

January Term, 1902.


Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with ten dollars costs, upon the authority of Sciolina v. Erie P. Co. ( 151 N.Y. 50) and Meeker v. Remington Sons Co. (Opinion by O'Brien, J., Court of Appeals, not published.)


Summaries of

Garlock v. New York Central and Hud. Riv. R.R. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 1, 1902
68 App. Div. 651 (N.Y. App. Div. 1902)
Case details for

Garlock v. New York Central and Hud. Riv. R.R. Co.

Case Details

Full title:Emogene Garlock, as Administratrix, etc., v. New York Central and Hudson…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1902

Citations

68 App. Div. 651 (N.Y. App. Div. 1902)