From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garlisch v. N.Y., Ontario and Western Railway Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1921
196 App. Div. 948 (N.Y. App. Div. 1921)

Opinion

April, 1921.


Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, on the authority of Kavanagh v. New York, Ontario Western R. Co. [ 196 App. Div. 384], decided herewith. Rich, Blackmar and Jaycox, JJ., concur; Mills, J., votes to affirm upon the ground that the term "negligence" used in the portion of the charge criticised was intended to include the idea of proximate cause, with whom Jenks, P.J., concurs.


Summaries of

Garlisch v. N.Y., Ontario and Western Railway Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1921
196 App. Div. 948 (N.Y. App. Div. 1921)
Case details for

Garlisch v. N.Y., Ontario and Western Railway Co.

Case Details

Full title:HENRIETTA GARLISCH, as Administratrix, etc., of OTTO GARLISCH, Deceased…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1921

Citations

196 App. Div. 948 (N.Y. App. Div. 1921)