From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garlington v. Kit Carson Corr. Facility/CCA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Nov 22, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02555-BNB (D. Colo. Nov. 22, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02555-BNB

11-22-2011

ANDRE L. GARLINGTON, Plaintiff, v. KIT CARSON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY/CCA, WARDEN VANCE EVERETTE, KCCC/CCA, and UM TAMERA COOPER, KCCC/CCA, Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff, Andre L. Garlington, is in the custody of the Colorado Department of Corrections and currently is incarcerated at the Kit Carson Correctional Center. Mr. Garlington initiated this action by submitting to the Court a pro se Prisoner Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and a Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 on September 29, 2011. On October 12, 2011, Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland granted Mr. Garlington leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

The October 12 Order requires Mr. Garlington to pay the full amount of the $350.00 filing fee in installments and directs him to pay an initial partial filing fee of $3.00 within thirty days or to show cause why he has no assets and no means to pay the initial fee by filing a current certified copy of his trust fund account statement. The Order warns Mr. Garlington that if he fails to have the initial partial filing fee sent to the Clerk of the Court by the designated deadline or to show cause why he has no assets and no means by which to pay the initial fee the Complaint would be dismissed without further notice.

Mr. Garlington has not communicated with the Court since September 29, 2011. Therefore, Mr. Garlington has failed either to pay the initial partial filing fee within the time allowed as designated in the October 12 Order, or in the alternative to show cause why he has no assets and no means by which to pay the designated fee. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the Prisoner Complaint and the action are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for Mr. Garlington's failure either to pay an initial partial filing fee of $3.00 or to show cause why he has no assets and no means by which to pay the designated fee. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are denied as moot.

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 22nd day of November, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

LEWIS T. BABCOCK

Senior Judge, United States District Court


Summaries of

Garlington v. Kit Carson Corr. Facility/CCA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Nov 22, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02555-BNB (D. Colo. Nov. 22, 2011)
Case details for

Garlington v. Kit Carson Corr. Facility/CCA

Case Details

Full title:ANDRE L. GARLINGTON, Plaintiff, v. KIT CARSON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY/CCA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Nov 22, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02555-BNB (D. Colo. Nov. 22, 2011)