From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garland v. Jones

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 25, 2023
2:22-cv-01494-EFB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01494-EFB (PC)

01-25-2023

SHAUN DARNELL GARLAND, Plaintiff, v. GENA JONES, Warden, Defendant.


ORDER

EDMUND F. BRENNAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff requests an extension of time to file an amended complaint in accordance with the court's December 12, 2022 screening order. Plaintiff's request is granted. The court notes, however, that filing an amended complaint should not require extensive materials or research. Nor should it include legal citations or unnecessarily detailed factual allegations. The court notes further that it is not a repository for plaintiff's evidence and he need not file documentary evidence in support of his claims unless it is necessary for the resolution of a motion.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 9) is granted and he shall file an amended complaint within 30 days from the date this order is served.


Summaries of

Garland v. Jones

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 25, 2023
2:22-cv-01494-EFB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2023)
Case details for

Garland v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:SHAUN DARNELL GARLAND, Plaintiff, v. GENA JONES, Warden, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jan 25, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-01494-EFB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2023)

Citing Cases

Graham v. Nevada

However, the Court is not a repository for Plaintiff's evidence and he need not file documentary evidence in…