From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garland v. Hedgpeth

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 7, 2011
No. C 08-00635 WHA (PR) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 08-00635 WHA (PR)

10-07-2011

SHAUN DARNELL GARLAND, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY HEDGPETH, J. BOLIN, THOMPSON, BLACKSTONE, J. VARGAS, J. OSTRANDER, Defendants.


ORDER EXTENDING TIME; ORDER DENYING MOTION

FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER;

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

This is a federal civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 by a pro se state prisoner. Plaintiff's motion to extend time to file an opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 72) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file such opposition on or before November 3, 2011. Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order (Docket No. 64) is DENIED. Plaintiff's allegations concerning searches of his cell and confiscations of his property are not part of this action. If plaintiff seeks relief on such claims, he may file a separate civil rights action. Plaintiff's motion for sanctions (Docket No. 71) is DENIED. In his opposition to the motion for summary judgment, plaintiff may include how defendants' alleged failure to comply with discovery requests affected his ability to prosecute this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Garland v. Hedgpeth

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 7, 2011
No. C 08-00635 WHA (PR) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2011)
Case details for

Garland v. Hedgpeth

Case Details

Full title:SHAUN DARNELL GARLAND, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY HEDGPETH, J. BOLIN, THOMPSON…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 7, 2011

Citations

No. C 08-00635 WHA (PR) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2011)