From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garfield National Bank v. Kirchwey

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
May 1, 1896
17 Misc. 148 (N.Y. App. Term 1896)

Opinion

May, 1896.

Hector M. Hitchings, for appellant.

John J. Adams, for respondent.


We decide, in this case, that the order must be reversed, upon the ground that the General Term of the City Court had the power to review the decision of the Special Term, although the order made at Special Term was one resting in the discretion of the court; that the General Term had not only the power to review that order, but it was its duty to do so on appeal. Sprague v. Dunton, 14 Hun. 490; Peart v. Peart, 48 id. 79; Neresheimer v. Bowe, 11 Daly, 306.

The order of the General Term is reversed, and the cause remitted to the General Term, with directions to hear the appeal. Ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant.

Present: DALY, P.J., McADAM and BISCHOFF, JJ.

Order reversed and case remitted with directions to hear appeal, with $10 costs and disbursements.


Summaries of

Garfield National Bank v. Kirchwey

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
May 1, 1896
17 Misc. 148 (N.Y. App. Term 1896)
Case details for

Garfield National Bank v. Kirchwey

Case Details

Full title:THE GARFIELD NATIONAL BANK, Respondent, v . GEORGE W. KIRCHWEY, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: May 1, 1896

Citations

17 Misc. 148 (N.Y. App. Term 1896)
39 N.Y.S. 333