From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garfias-Rodriguez v.  Holder 

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Mar 1, 2012
672 F.3d 1125 (9th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 09–72603.

2012-03-1

Francisco Javier GARFIAS–RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

Matt Adams, Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner. Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, OIL, Luis E. Perez, Senior Litigation Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.


Matt Adams, Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner. Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, OIL, Luis E. Perez, Senior Litigation Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. Stephen William Manning, Immigrant Law Group PC, Portland, OR, for Amicus Curiae.Agency No. A079–766–006.

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35–3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judge CHRISTEN did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.


Summaries of

Garfias-Rodriguez v.  Holder 

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Mar 1, 2012
672 F.3d 1125 (9th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Garfias-Rodriguez v.  Holder 

Case Details

Full title:Francisco Javier GARFIAS–RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Date published: Mar 1, 2012

Citations

672 F.3d 1125 (9th Cir. 2012)

Citing Cases

Gonzales v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec.

Garfias–Rodriguez did not present a law-of-the-case issue because there was no final decision by the Ninth…

Garfias–Rodriguez v. Holder

A panel of this court rejected his claims and denied the petition for review. Garfias–Rodriguez v. Holder,…