From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gardner v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Nov 17, 2009
297 S.W.3d 645 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)

Opinion

No. ED92793.

November 17, 2009.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Steven Ohmer, Judge.

Timothy Forneris, Office of the Missouri Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.

Chris Koster, Attorney General, Mary H. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Before KURT S. ODENWALD, P.J., GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J., and ROY L. RICHTER, J.



ORDER


James Gardner appeals from the motion court's judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his amended Motion under Rule 29.15 to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence and Request for Evidentiary Hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2008, unless otherwise indicated.


Summaries of

Gardner v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Nov 17, 2009
297 S.W.3d 645 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)
Case details for

Gardner v. State

Case Details

Full title:James GARDNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Nov 17, 2009

Citations

297 S.W.3d 645 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)