From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gardner v. Reindollar

STATE OF TEXAS IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
Jul 17, 2014
No. 10-13-00249-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 17, 2014)

Opinion

No. 10-13-00249-CV

07-17-2014

MILTON L GARDNER, Appellant v. KIMBERLY REINDOLLAR, Appellee


From the 77th District Court

Limestone County, Texas

Trial Court No. 30,200-A


ORDER

Milton L. Gardner appealed the trial court's final protective order issued against Gardner and for the protection of Kimberly M. Reindollar. We affirmed the trial court's order on March 27, 2014. Gardner has now filed a Motion for Stay of Mandate and a motion to dispense with the service requirements of Rule 9.5 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Gardner's motion for a stay of the mandate is denied. The motion does not meet the requirements for a stay of this Court's mandate. See TEX. R. APP. P. 18.2. Further, we use Rule 2 to dismiss Gardner's motion to dispense with the service requirements. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2.

PER CURIAM Before Chief Justice Gray,
Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins
Motion for stay denied
Motion to dispense with service requirements dismissed


Summaries of

Gardner v. Reindollar

STATE OF TEXAS IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
Jul 17, 2014
No. 10-13-00249-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 17, 2014)
Case details for

Gardner v. Reindollar

Case Details

Full title:MILTON L GARDNER, Appellant v. KIMBERLY REINDOLLAR, Appellee

Court:STATE OF TEXAS IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

Date published: Jul 17, 2014

Citations

No. 10-13-00249-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 17, 2014)