From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gardner v. Newsom

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 26, 2021
No.: 1:20-cv-00240-NONE-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2021)

Opinion

No.: 1:20-cv-00240-NONE-SAB (PC)

02-26-2021

RONDEL DELBERT GARDNER, Plaintiff, v. GAVIN NEWSOM, et.al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

(Doc. Nos. 68, 70)

Plaintiff Rondel Delbert Gardner is proceeding in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On January 22, 2021, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that plaintiff's motion for default judgment be denied. (Doc. No. 70.) The findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice that objections were due within fourteen (14) days. (Id.)

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this court has conducted a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court concludes that the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis. /// ///

Accordingly,

1. The findings and recommendations issued on January 22, 2021 (Doc. No. 70), are adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff's motion for default judgment (Doc. No. 68) is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 26 , 2021

/s/_________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Gardner v. Newsom

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 26, 2021
No.: 1:20-cv-00240-NONE-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2021)
Case details for

Gardner v. Newsom

Case Details

Full title:RONDEL DELBERT GARDNER, Plaintiff, v. GAVIN NEWSOM, et.al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 26, 2021

Citations

No.: 1:20-cv-00240-NONE-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2021)