Gardner v. Kutztown Univ.

Full title: CAROLYN GARDNER v. KUTZTOWN UNIVERSITY, et al.

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 27, 2024

Civil Action 22-1034 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 27, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 22-1034

03-27-2024

CAROLYN GARDNER v. KUTZTOWN UNIVERSITY, et al.

JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL, J.

ORDER

JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL, J.

AND NOW, this 27^th day of March, 2024, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgement [Doc. 43] is GRANTED.

2. Judgment is ENTERED in favor of the Plaintiff and against Defendant Kutztown University on Counts I, II, III, IV, V and the part of Count VI asserting a claim for interference.

3. The Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 63] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

4. The Motion is GRANTED as to Counts VII, VIII, XI and XII and the part of Count VI asserting a claim for retaliation.

5. The motion is DENIED as to all other Counts.

6. Judgment is ENTERED in favor of Defendant Kutztown University and against the Plaintiff on the part of Count VI asserting a claim for retaliation.

7. Judgment is ENTERED in favor of Defendant Kenneth Hawkinson and against Plaintiff on Counts VII and VIII of the Complaint.

8. Judgment is ENTERED in favor of Defendant Jesus Pena and against Plaintiff on Count XI of the Complaint.

9. Judgment is ENTERED in favor of Defendant Jennifer Weidman and against Plaintiff on Count XII of the Complaint.¹

1 There are no Counts IX or X listed in the Complaint.