From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gardner v. Harry

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Aug 9, 2022
Civil Action 1:22-CV-1007 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 9, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 1:22-CV-1007

08-09-2022

DARRYL GARDNER, Plaintiff v. LAUREL HARRY, et al., Defendants


(Judge Conner)

ORDER

CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER, DISTRICT JUDGE

AND NOW, this 9th day of August, 2022, upon review of plaintiff's complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's claim that his placement in a double cell violates Pennsylvania Department of Corrections policy is DISMISSED with prejudice.
2. The remainder of plaintiff's complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice.
3. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint on or before September 9, 2022 to cure the deficiencies identified in the court's memorandum opinion. Any amended complaint filed pursuant to this order shall be filed to the same docket number as the instant action, shall be entitled “Amended Complaint,” and shall be complete in all respects. It shall be a new pleading that stands by itself as an adequate complaint under the F ederal Rules of Civil Procedure.
4. If plaintiff does not file an amended complaint by the above date, this case will be dismissed without further leave to amend for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum.


Summaries of

Gardner v. Harry

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Aug 9, 2022
Civil Action 1:22-CV-1007 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 9, 2022)
Case details for

Gardner v. Harry

Case Details

Full title:DARRYL GARDNER, Plaintiff v. LAUREL HARRY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Aug 9, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 1:22-CV-1007 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 9, 2022)