From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gardner v. Goss

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 13, 1976
138 Ga. App. 637 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976)

Opinion

52180.

ARGUED MAY 4, 1976.

DECIDED MAY 13, 1976.

Breach of warranty. DeKalb State Court. Before Judge Mitchell.

Michael J. Reily, for appellant.

Theodore C. Goss, pro se.


This case involves an alleged breach of warranty. A bench trial was held, and a judgment was entered for the plaintiff in the amount of $250. Motion for new trial was filed and denied. Defendant appeals. Held:

1. The transcript of evidence is unavailable, hence this court cannot consider any of the grounds of the motion for new trial requiring consideration of the evidence.

2. But defendant also appeals the failure of the trial court to make a finding of facts and conclusions of law separately as required by Code Ann. § 81A-152 (a) (CPA § 52). Where a civil case is tried without a jury, the trial judge shall make finding of facts specially and state separately its conclusions of law. See Leasing International, Inc. v. Plemons, 136 Ga. App. 455 ( 221 S.E.2d 663) and cases cited therein. Accordingly, we remand the appeal with direction that the trial court vacate the judgment, make appropriate finding of facts and conclusions of law and enter a new judgment thereon, after which the losing party shall be free to enter another appeal.

Appeal remanded with direction. Pannell, P. J., and Marshall, J., concur.

ARGUED MAY 4, 1976 — DECIDED MAY 13, 1976.


Summaries of

Gardner v. Goss

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 13, 1976
138 Ga. App. 637 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976)
Case details for

Gardner v. Goss

Case Details

Full title:GARDNER v. GOSS

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: May 13, 1976

Citations

138 Ga. App. 637 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976)
227 S.E.2d 92

Citing Cases

Ind. District No. 68 v. Diebert

If they discharged respondent without justifiable cause, then undoubtedly there was a breach of contract for…

Gosnell Sp. School Dist. No. 6 v. Baggett

Objection was made to the introduction of this decree in evidence upon the ground that it appeared to have…