From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gardner v. Baca

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jul 11, 2017
No. 71391 (Nev. Jul. 11, 2017)

Opinion

No. 71391

07-11-2017

WILLIAM JAMES GARDNER, Appellant, v. ISIDRO BACA, WARDEN, Respondent.


ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from an order of the district court denying appellant William Gardner's April 22, 2016, postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus (credits). First Judicial District Court, Carson City; William A. Maddox, Senior Judge.

Gardner challenged the computation of time served as it applied to his parole eligibility. In response to an order of this court, the attorney general advises that Gardner has no additional sentences left to serve and has been released on parole. Because a parole hearing was the only relief available to Gardner, he has in fact been granted parole, and no statutory authority or case law permits a retroactive grant of parole, see Niergarth v. Warden, 105 Nev. 26, 29, 768 P.2d 882, 884 (1989), Gardner's claim is moot. See Johnson v. Dir., Nev. Dep't. of Prisons, 105 Nev. 314, 316, 774 P.2d 1047, 1049 (1989). Accordingly, we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

/s/_________, J.

Hardesty /s/_________, J.
Parraguirre /s/_________, J.
Stiglich cc: Chief Judge, The First Judicial District Court

Hon. William A. Maddox, Senior Judge

William James Gardner

Attorney General/Carson City

Carson City Clerk


Summaries of

Gardner v. Baca

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jul 11, 2017
No. 71391 (Nev. Jul. 11, 2017)
Case details for

Gardner v. Baca

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM JAMES GARDNER, Appellant, v. ISIDRO BACA, WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Jul 11, 2017

Citations

No. 71391 (Nev. Jul. 11, 2017)