From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garding v. State

United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division
May 18, 2009
Case No. 2:09CV246 DAK (D. Utah May. 18, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 2:09CV246 DAK.

May 18, 2009


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


On March 7, 2008, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation in this matter, recommending that the Complaint be dismissed.

Plaintiff has not filed any objection to the Report and Recommendation, and the time for doing so has now passed. The court has reviewed the file de novo and agrees that this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over Garding's claims under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine and is barred from exercising jurisdiction over a case in which there may be ongoing state proceedings pursuant to Younger v. Harris. Moreover, to the extent Plaintiff is suing the State of Utah, the state is not a "person" within the meaning of Section 1983.

Accordingly, the court hereby APPROVES AND ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED, Plaintiff's Motion for Service of Process [Docket # 5] is MOOT, and Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel [Docket # 6] is MOOT. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.


Summaries of

Garding v. State

United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division
May 18, 2009
Case No. 2:09CV246 DAK (D. Utah May. 18, 2009)
Case details for

Garding v. State

Case Details

Full title:GABRIELLE GARDING, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF UTAH, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division

Date published: May 18, 2009

Citations

Case No. 2:09CV246 DAK (D. Utah May. 18, 2009)