From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gardine v. Martuscello

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 15, 2018
159 A.D.3d 1206 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

525044

03-15-2018

In the Matter of Wayne GARDINE, Petitioner, v. Daniel MARTUSCELLO, as Superintendent of Coxsackie Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

Wayne Gardine, Napanoch, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondents.


Wayne Gardine, Napanoch, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Garry, P.J., McCarthy, Devine, Rumsey and Pritzker, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Superintendent of Coxsackie Correctional Facility finding petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Determination confirmed. No opinion.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Garry, P.J., McCarthy, Devine, Rumsey and Pritzker, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Gardine v. Martuscello

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 15, 2018
159 A.D.3d 1206 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

Gardine v. Martuscello

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of WAYNE GARDINE, Petitioner, v. DANIEL MARTUSCELLO, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 15, 2018

Citations

159 A.D.3d 1206 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 1688
70 N.Y.S.3d 94