From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

GARD v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC

Court of Appeal of California
Jan 1, 1986
185 Cal.App.3d 583 (Cal. Ct. App. 1986)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In Gard v. Raymark Industries, Inc., 229 Cal. Rptr. 861 (Cal.Ct.App. 1986) plaintiff had voluntarily dismissed his negligence claim, a product liability failure to warn count, and the second prong of the design defect test.

Summary of this case from In re Hawaii Federal Asbestos Cases
See 2 Summaries

Opinion

1986.

[EDITORS' NOTE: PAGES 584 — 615 CONTAINING GARD v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. AND AGUAYO v. UNEMPLOYMENT INS. APPEALS BD. HAVE BEEN OMITTED.]

Deleted on direction of Supreme Court by orders dated December 31, 1986, and December 11, 1986.

Summaries of

GARD v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC

Court of Appeal of California
Jan 1, 1986
185 Cal.App.3d 583 (Cal. Ct. App. 1986)

In Gard v. Raymark Industries, Inc., 229 Cal. Rptr. 861 (Cal.Ct.App. 1986) plaintiff had voluntarily dismissed his negligence claim, a product liability failure to warn count, and the second prong of the design defect test.

Summary of this case from In re Hawaii Federal Asbestos Cases

In Gard v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1986), 229 Cal.Rptr. 861, the court ruled that a jury instruction based on the burden-shifting theory in Summers v. Tice was proper.

Summary of this case from Goldman v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.
Case details for

GARD v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC

Case Details

Full title:Gard v. Raymark Industries, Inc. and Aguayo v. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd

Court:Court of Appeal of California

Date published: Jan 1, 1986

Citations

185 Cal.App.3d 583 (Cal. Ct. App. 1986)

Citing Cases

N Y Silicone Implant Litig

As product design and product use varies, allowing more fibers or fewer fibers to become airborne when the…

Univ. Sys. of New Hampshire v. U.S. Gypsum

See Menne v. Celotex Corp., 861 F.2d 1453 (10th Cir. 1988); City of Detroit v. Celotex, No. 84-42963 (Wayne…

4 Citing Cases