Opinion
2:23-CV-01211-CDS-EJY
08-30-2023
ZIMMERMAN REED LLP Hart L. Robinovitch Zachary J. Freese DAVID A. MARKMAN, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiff. Ashley L. Shively Daniel P. Kappes Zachary T. Watterson HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP J. Colby Williams Philip R. Erwin CAMPBELL & WILLIAMS Attorneys for Defendant Zuffa, LLC.
ZIMMERMAN REED LLP Hart L. Robinovitch Zachary J. Freese DAVID A. MARKMAN, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiff.
Ashley L. Shively Daniel P. Kappes Zachary T. Watterson HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP J. Colby Williams Philip R. Erwin CAMPBELL & WILLIAMS Attorneys for Defendant Zuffa, LLC.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (SECOND REQUEST)
Pursuant to Local Rule IA 6-1, 6-2 and LR 7-1, the undersigned counsel of record for Plaintiff Saul Garcia and Defendant Zuffa, LLC hereby STIPULATE to extend the time for Zuffa to file an answer or move in response to the complaint. Per the parties' first stipulation and the Court's August 8, 2023 Order, Zuffa's response to the complaint is currently due August 30, 2023. ECF No. 5.
On August 24, 2023, Zuffa filed a Motion to Consolidate this case with the related cases, Reza, et al. v. Zuffa, LLC et al., Case No. 2:23-cv-00802-CDS-EJY, and Sanchez v. Zuffa, LLC, Case No. 2:23-cv-01259-CDS-EJY. As such, any response to the complaint in this action may be moot should the Court grant the Motion to Consolidate. The parties agree it would be in the interest of judicial economy to defer Zuffa's deadline to file an answer or move until 21 days after a consolidated amended complaint is filed, or after the Motion to Consolidate is denied, as the case may be
This is the second stipulation seeking to extend the subject deadline. Zuffa submits that the extension requests herein is not for purposes of delay.
IT IS SO ORDERED.