From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garcia v. Wright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 2, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02722-CMA-KLM (D. Colo. Aug. 2, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02722-CMA-KLM

08-02-2012

ANTHONY LAWRENCE GARCIA, Plaintiff, v. DR. WRIGHT, individually and as a Centennial Correctional Facility physician, and DR. WHITE, individually and as a Buena Vista Correctional Complex physician, Defendants.


MINUTE ORDER

ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Copies of Discovery [Docket No. 74; July 25, 2012] (the "Motion"). Although Plaintiff proceeds in this matter pro se, he must comply with the same rules of procedure that govern other litigants. See Green v. Dorrell, 969 F.2d 915, 917 (10th Cir. 1992); see also Nielsen v. Price, 17 F.3d 1276, 1277 (10th Cir. 1994). The Court may not order other parties to supply him with multiple copies of discovery or other litigation paperwork; rather, Plaintiff, despite proceeding in forma pauperis [#3], is responsible for making his own copies, which, in some instances, may include handwriting his own copies. See Cole v. Pugh, No. CIVA-06CV-01392-BNB, 2006 WL 3328195, at *2 (D. Colo. Nov. 15, 2006); Hagan v. Credit Union of Am., No. 11-1131-JTM, 2011 WL 6739595, at *2 (D. Kan. Dec. 22, 2011). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#74] is DENIED.


Summaries of

Garcia v. Wright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 2, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02722-CMA-KLM (D. Colo. Aug. 2, 2012)
Case details for

Garcia v. Wright

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY LAWRENCE GARCIA, Plaintiff, v. DR. WRIGHT, individually and as a…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Aug 2, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02722-CMA-KLM (D. Colo. Aug. 2, 2012)