From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garcia v. Valenzuela

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 18, 2014
Case No. CV 13-1622-ODW (DTB) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 18, 2014)

Summary

hearing the merits of claims filed using an improper procedural vehicle only after affording the non-moving party an additional opportunity to respond

Summary of this case from United States v. Gibson Wine Co.

Opinion

Case No. CV 13-1622-ODW (DTB)

02-18-2014

LLOYD GARCIA, Petitioner, v. E. VALENZUELA, Warden, Respondent.


JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge,

IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that petitioner's ex post facto claim is dismissed without prejudice, and petitioner's remaining claims are dismissed with prejudice.

__________

OTIS D. WRIGHT, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Garcia v. Valenzuela

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 18, 2014
Case No. CV 13-1622-ODW (DTB) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 18, 2014)

hearing the merits of claims filed using an improper procedural vehicle only after affording the non-moving party an additional opportunity to respond

Summary of this case from United States v. Gibson Wine Co.
Case details for

Garcia v. Valenzuela

Case Details

Full title:LLOYD GARCIA, Petitioner, v. E. VALENZUELA, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 18, 2014

Citations

Case No. CV 13-1622-ODW (DTB) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 18, 2014)

Citing Cases

United States v. Gibson Wine Co.

A court should only consider the underlying merits of an improperly designated motion if construing the…

Lyon v. Jones

(citation omitted); Garcia v. Valenzuela, 2014 WL 683795, at *3 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 18, 2014) (denial of…