From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garcia v. U.S. Floral Corporation

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 3, 1999
745 So. 2d 429 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 99-1394.

Opinion filed November 3, 1999.

An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Ronald Friedman, Judge; L.T. No. 99-9409.

Robert J. Schaffer; Martinez Gutierrez, Renaldy J. Gutierrez and Kathleen M. Sales, for appellant.

Kirkpatrick Lockhart, Gregg J. Breitbart and Sherry D. Williams, for appellee.

Before GODERICH, FLETCHER and SORONDO, JJ.


Because the plaintiff, U.S. Floral Corporation, presented sufficient evidence of a legitimate business interest justifying the restrictive covenant, § 542.335, Fla. Stat. (1999), and irreparable harm, Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.610, we affirm the trial court's entry of a temporary injunction. See Aero Kool Corp. v. Oosthuizen, 736 So.2d 25 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Garcia v. U.S. Floral Corporation

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 3, 1999
745 So. 2d 429 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Garcia v. U.S. Floral Corporation

Case Details

Full title:MARVIN GARCIA, Appellant, vs. U.S. FLORAL CORPORATION, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Nov 3, 1999

Citations

745 So. 2d 429 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)