From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garcia v. U.S.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Apr 16, 2009
321 F. App'x 90 (2d Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 07-2288-pr.

April 16, 2009.

Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Sand, J.).

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

John Burke, Brooklyn, NY, for Appellant.

Benjamin A. Naftalis, Andrew L. Fish, Assistant United States Attorneys, for Lev L. Dassin, Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, New York, NY, for Appellee.

PRESENT: Hon. DENNIS JACOBS, Chief Judge, Hon. JOSÉ A. CABRANES, and Hon. SONIA SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judges.


SUMMARY ORDER

Petitioner-Appellant Alberto Serna Garcia appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York denying his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Garcia v. United States, No. 06 Civ. 7821(LBS), 2007 WL 1295726 (S.D.N.Y. April 26, 2007). Garcia contends that he received ineffective assistance of counsel when his attorney failed to fully inform him of the availability of safety valve relief before Garcia pleaded guilty pursuant to an agreement. We assume the parties' familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history of the case, and the issues on appeal.

We have considered all of Garcia's arguments and conclude that they are without merit. We affirm for substantially the reasons stated by the district court in its thorough and well — reasoned decision.

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Garcia v. U.S.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Apr 16, 2009
321 F. App'x 90 (2d Cir. 2009)
Case details for

Garcia v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:Alberto Serna GARCIA, Petitioner-Appellant, UNITED STATES of America…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Apr 16, 2009

Citations

321 F. App'x 90 (2d Cir. 2009)