From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garcia v. Tyson Foods, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Feb 24, 2012
Case No. 6:11 CV 01141-JTM-JPO (D. Kan. Feb. 24, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 6:11 CV 01141-JTM-JPO

02-24-2012

ANTONIO GARCIA, Plaintiff, v. TYSON FOODS, INC., et al., Defendants.


STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED BY THE PARTIES, and APPROVED BY THE COURT, as follows:

WHEREAS, counsel and parties to the above captioned case will be given access to confidential business records and other confidential information, including information from personnel and company records; and

WHEREAS, confidential business records and other confidential, personal and sensitive information should be given the protection of an Order of this Court to prevent injury through use not in connection with the prosecution of this pending litigation and disclosure to persons other than those persons involved in the prosecution of this litigation;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Confidential treatment as provided below may be claimed by the parties for documents and information and any portion or summary thereof relating to the subject matter of the following types:

(a) personal information concerning Tyson's current and former employees who are not parties to this litigation;
(b) confidential, non-public security, trade secret or proprietary information;
(c) documents concerning financial and employment matters; and
(d) documents of a personal and sensitive nature such as Plaintiff's medical records.

2. Upon the production of documents in response to a request for production, and in the event that counsel should desire to copy all or any portion of a document designated as confidential, such document shall be appropriately marked "CONFIDENTIAL" or "CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY." Counsel may also notify the receiving party in writing which material is designated CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL— ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY using bates numbers or other means to signify the materials so designated.

3. Documents or materials designated as CONFIDENTIAL may be shown or disclosed only to the following persons:

(a) counsel of record in this action and the parties in this action: Antonio Garcia, and a designated representative of Tyson;
(b) employees of counsel of record assigned to and assisting such counsel in Antonio Garcia v. Tyson Foods, Inc., et al., Case No. 6:11-cv-01141-JTM-JPO;
(c) experts and consultants provided, however, that the following procedures and restrictions are applied:
(1) No expert or consultant to whom CONFIDENTIAL information has been disclosed pursuant to this paragraph shall use such information except for the prosecution or defense of Antonio Garcia v. Tyson Foods, Inc., et al., Case No. 6:11-cv-01141-JTM-JPO; and
(2) Counsel desiring to disclose CONFIDENTIAL information to experts or consultants must first obtain a signed agreement to abide by Protective Order in the form of Exhibit A attached hereto from each such expert or consultant and each of his
clerical personnel who would require access to CONFIDENTIAL information, and counsel shall retain in his file the original of each signed agreement to abide by Protective Order.
(d) A witness on behalf of, or current or former employees of, the disclosing party; or such other witness who has previously had access to the CONFIDENTIAL information or whose testimony is otherwise relevant to the claims or defenses in Antonio Garcia v. Tyson Foods, Inc., et al., Case No. 6:11-cv-01141-JTM-JPO; provided that, at the request of the disclosing party, such witness shall first agree on the record to abide by the terms of this Protective Order and shall sign the agreement attached as Exhibit A; and
(e) The Court and court personnel, including court reporters at proceedings in this action.

4. CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY documents or testimony may be disclosed only to counsel and not to any party or non-party except for experts and consultants as stated in paragraph 3(c) and with the protective measures required in 3(c).

5. Persons having knowledge of CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL— ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY information by virtue of their participation in the conduct of this litigation shall use the information for that purpose only, and shall not disclose such information to any person or persons not involved in the conduct of this litigation.

6. Information revealed during a deposition upon oral examination may be designated CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY subject to this Protective Order if the disclosing party has: (a)(1) indicated on the record or in writing at the time the deposition was taken or prior to preparation of the transcript, that portions of the deposition contain CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY information; (a)(2) has instructed the court reporter prior to preparation of the transcript to indicate on the face page of the deposition that it contains CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY information; or (b) has notified opposing counsel in writing within five (5) business days after receipt of the transcript that the transcript contains CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY information. All depositions, regardless of whether a designation of confidentiality was made on the record, shall be treated as containing both CONFIDENTIAL and CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY information and subject to this Protective Order until five (5) business days have passed following receipt of the transcript or ten (10) days after the entry of this order, whichever is longer. Where testimony is designated at or before a deposition as "CONFIDENTIAL— ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY," the Designating Party may exclude from the deposition all persons other than the court reporter, witness, Counsel for the Parties, and experts.

7. A party seeking to file CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY information with the Court must first file a motion with the Court requesting leave to file the documents or information under seal. No CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL— ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY information may be filed under seal unless and until leave has been granted to file. Any such information will not be used by any person (except the disclosing party or parties) for any purpose other than for discovery in this civil action, proceedings before this Court in this civil action, preparation for trial and trial of this civil action and any appeals.

8. Subject to the terms of this order, CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL— ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY information may be used in testimony at trial, at any motion hearing, and at depositions, and may be offered in evidence at trial or in any motion hearing, provided that such information has been previously designated as an exhibit before such use to provide any opposing party an opportunity to obtain appropriate protection from the court. If the disclosing party seeks to bar the access to any proceeding of any person who is not permitted access to CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY information, the disclosing party may seek a court order to bar such person—other than a party—from attending any portion of trial, any motion hearing, other hearing or deposition at which the information is revealed. Subject to the terms of this protective order, confidential documents may be offered in evidence at any deposition, trial or hearing provided the disclosing party may designate portions of the deposition testimony as CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL— ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY and may seek an appropriate order of the court to protect the confidentiality of the documents and their contents at trial.

9. The parties agree that the identities and CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL— ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY information relating to nonparties will not be used for any purpose other than the prosecution and defense of Antonio Garcia v. Tyson Foods, Inc., et al., Case No. 6:11-cv-01141-JTM-JPO. No CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY information may be used in other lawsuits or for any other purpose than the prosecution and defense of Antonio Garcia v. Tyson Foods, Inc., et al., Case No. 6:11-cv-01141-JTM-JPO.

10. Nothing contained in this Protective Order shall preclude any party from using its own CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY information in any manner it sees fit, without the prior consent of any other person or the Court.

11. If it is determined by the Court during trial that the documents identified as CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY information are irrelevant to this case and are inadmissible, then all original and copies of materials designated as CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY information must be returned to the disclosing party unless they have been included in a proffer of evidence to the Court.

12. In the event the disclosing party determines CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY information has been disclosed not in conformity with the Protective Order, the disclosing party must identify said material within ten (10) days of discovering such materials have been produced. In the event material has been disclosed prior to the entry of this order, but is CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL— ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY information, the disclosing party has ten (10) days from entry of this order to notify the non-disclosing party in writing of the documents/materials previously produced that are CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY. This Protective Order will govern the use of said materials.

13. If information subject to a claim of attorney-client privilege or work product immunity is inadvertently or mistakenly disclosed, such disclosure shall in no way prejudice or otherwise constitute a waiver of, or estoppel as to, any claim of privilege or work-product immunity for such information. If a party has inadvertently or mistakenly disclosed information subject to a claim of immunity or privilege, upon request made by the disclosing party within ten (10) business days of discovery of such inadvertent or mistaken disclosure, the information for which a claim of inadvertent disclosure is made shall be returned within three (3) business days of such request and, all copies of inadvertently or mistakenly disclosed documents shall be destroyed. Nothing in this Protective Order is intended to operate as a waiver of any claim of privilege or immunity.

14. A party receiving information marked CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL— ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY may, within thirty (30) days of receiving such information, provide written notice to the providing party that the receiving party in good faith denies that certain documents or other materials marked as Confidential or Confidential—Attorneys' Eyes Only are entitled to such status and protection. To maintain Confidential / Confidential— Attorneys' Eyes Only status, the proponent of confidentiality shall, within fifteen (15) days of receiving such written notice, apply to the Court for protection. Unless the receiving party provides written notice challenging Confidential / Confidential—Attorneys' Eyes Only status, as set forth above, all such information so marked shall be deemed to be Confidential or Confidential—Attorneys' Eyes Only.

15. This Court's jurisdiction, including jurisdiction to enforce the provisions of this Order, is terminated upon final disposition of this case. A party may, however, seek leave to reopen the case to enforce the provisions of this Order.

16. Upon final termination of this action, whether by trial, settlement, dismissal or otherwise, counsel for the receiving party must return any and all copies of CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY information, including but not limited to that disclosed in discovery, material submitted to the court including exhibits, but not deposition transcripts and transcripts of court proceedings, in their possession, custody or control or in the custody of their authorized agents, outside experts and consultants, to counsel for the party who provided such CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY information or confirm the destruction of such documents. As to CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY information reflected in computer databases or backup tapes, the receiving party shall delete all such information and certify the deletion to the party who provided the information upon termination of the action. The non-disclosing party shall be permitted to retain deposition, but must stamp such transcripts "Under Seal" and must continue to abide by all terms of this Protective Order with regard to said transcripts.

17. Counsel for the parties shall exercise all reasonable care not to needlessly disclose such confidential information in the public record of this proceeding.

IT IS SO ORDERED:

Dated February 24, 2012, at Kansas City, Kansas.

______________________

HONORABLE JAMES P. O'HARA

United States Magistrate Judge

This order agreed to by:

GARCIA & ANTOSH, LLP

Peter J. Antosh

KS #21334

1401 Central

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

BRYAN CAVE LLP

Robert J. Hoffman KS #16453

Ashley N. Gillard KS #24869

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS

EXHIBIT "A"


DECLARATION OF

STATE OF _________________)

)ss.

COUNTY OF_________________)

1. My name is _________________. I live at _________________. I am employed as _________________ by _________________.

2. I am aware that a protective order has been entered in Antonio Garcia v. Tyson Foods, Inc., et al., Case No. 6:11-cv-01141-JTM-JPO in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas, and a copy thereof has been given to me.

3. I promise the documents and information given confidential treatment under the protective order entered in this case will be used by me only in connection with assisting counsel in preparing for litigation in the above referenced matters.

4. I promise that I will not disclose or discuss such confidential documents or information with any person other than the parties and counsel for the parties or members of their staff.

5. I understand that any use of information obtained by me for material stamped "CONFIDENTIAL" or any portions or summaries thereof, in any manner contrary to the provisions of the protective order may subject me to summary sanctions for contempt in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas.


Summaries of

Garcia v. Tyson Foods, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Feb 24, 2012
Case No. 6:11 CV 01141-JTM-JPO (D. Kan. Feb. 24, 2012)
Case details for

Garcia v. Tyson Foods, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO GARCIA, Plaintiff, v. TYSON FOODS, INC., et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Date published: Feb 24, 2012

Citations

Case No. 6:11 CV 01141-JTM-JPO (D. Kan. Feb. 24, 2012)