From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garcia v. Torrano

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Apr 7, 2022
21-cv-06896-PJH (N.D. Cal. Apr. 7, 2022)

Opinion

21-cv-06896-PJH

04-07-2022

ORLANDO GARCIA, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH P. TORRANO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL RE: DKT. NO. 27

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The parties, by their counsel, advised the court that the parties have reached a provisional settlement of this case. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed without prejudice and all pending dates are vacated. However, if any party certifies to the court within 60 days that the settlement has not been finalized, this order shall stand vacated and this case shall be restored to the calendar to be set for trial.

If no certification is filed, after passage of 60 days, the dismissal shall be with prejudice. The parties may, of course, substitute a dismissal with prejudice at any time during this 60-day period.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Garcia v. Torrano

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Apr 7, 2022
21-cv-06896-PJH (N.D. Cal. Apr. 7, 2022)
Case details for

Garcia v. Torrano

Case Details

Full title:ORLANDO GARCIA, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH P. TORRANO, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Apr 7, 2022

Citations

21-cv-06896-PJH (N.D. Cal. Apr. 7, 2022)