From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garcia v. TI Hang Lung, Co.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 15, 2021
21-cv-04914-JD (N.D. Cal. Sep. 15, 2021)

Opinion

21-cv-04914-JD

09-15-2021

ORLANDO GARCIA, Plaintiff, v. TI HANG LUNG, CO., INC., Defendant.


ORDER CONDITIONALLY DISMISSING CASE

JAMES DONATO, United States District Judge.

The Court is advised that the parties have settled. Dkt. No. 11. Consequently, the Court vacates all pretrial deadlines and dismisses this case without prejudice. If any party certifies to the Court within 60 days from the date of this order that the agreed consideration for the settlement of this action has not been delivered, this order will be vacated and the case will be set for a case management conference. If no certification is filed, the dismissal will be deemed to be with prejudice after the 60 days.

The parties are directed not to ask the Court for a “dismissal with prejudice” at any time after this order, or to ask for an order confirming dismissal under FRCP 41(a)(1). No Court order is necessary for dismissal under that rule.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Garcia v. TI Hang Lung, Co.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 15, 2021
21-cv-04914-JD (N.D. Cal. Sep. 15, 2021)
Case details for

Garcia v. TI Hang Lung, Co.

Case Details

Full title:ORLANDO GARCIA, Plaintiff, v. TI HANG LUNG, CO., INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Sep 15, 2021

Citations

21-cv-04914-JD (N.D. Cal. Sep. 15, 2021)