From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garcia v. Steadfast Ins. Co.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Sep 24, 2024
2:24-cv-01843-AB-PVC (C.D. Cal. Sep. 24, 2024)

Opinion

2:24-cv-01843-AB-PVC

09-24-2024

Sergio Garcia Plaintiff, v. Steadfast Insurance Company et al Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

(PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 41)

ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

On August 28, 2024, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. A written response to the Order to Show Cause was ordered to be filed no later than September 13, 2024. No response having been filed to the Court's Order to Show Cause, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the above-entitled case is dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the orders of the Court, pursuant to Local Rule 41.


Summaries of

Garcia v. Steadfast Ins. Co.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Sep 24, 2024
2:24-cv-01843-AB-PVC (C.D. Cal. Sep. 24, 2024)
Case details for

Garcia v. Steadfast Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:Sergio Garcia Plaintiff, v. Steadfast Insurance Company et al Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Sep 24, 2024

Citations

2:24-cv-01843-AB-PVC (C.D. Cal. Sep. 24, 2024)