Opinion
No. 05-08-00774-CR.
Opinion Filed March 4, 2009. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex. R. App. P. 47
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2 Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. F04-74017-RI.
Before Justices RICHTER, LANG, and MURPHY.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Frencho Garcia appeals from his conviction for burglary of a habitation. After adjudicating appellant's guilt, the trial court assessed punishment at seven years' imprisonment. On appeal, appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. Appellant filed a pro se response raising several issues. We have reviewed the record, counsel's brief, and appellant's pro se response. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex.Crim.App. 2005). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court's judgment.