From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garcia v. State

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Jun 22, 2016
No. 04-15-00771-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 22, 2016)

Opinion

No. 04-15-00771-CR

06-22-2016

John David GARCIA, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee


From the 81st Judicial District Court, Wilson County, Texas
Trial Court No. 11-05-075-CRW
Honorable Russell H. Wilson, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant John David Garcia's court-appointed attorney has filed a brief and motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he asserts there are no meritorious issues to raise on appeal. Counsel sent copies of the brief and motion to withdraw to Garcia and explained his rights to review the record, file a pro se brief, and file a pro se petition for discretionary review if this court determines the appeal is frivolous. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). In addition, counsel's letter advised appellant to immediately file a motion in this court if he wished to review the appellate record, and counsel enclosed a form motion for this purpose. See id. The State has filed a notice waiving its right to file a brief in this case unless appellant files a pro se brief. We order appellant John David Garcia may file a pro se brief by July 22, 2016. If appellant files a timely pro se brief, the State may file a responsive brief no later than thirty days after appellant's pro se brief is filed in this court. We order the motion to withdraw filed by appellant's counsel is held in abeyance pending further order of the court. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-82 (1988) (holding that a motion to withdraw should not be ruled on before appellate court independently reviews the record to determine whether counsel's evaluation that the appeal is frivolous is sound); Schulman v. State, 252 S.W.3d 403, 410-11 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (same); see also Kelly, 436 S.W.3d at 319 (appointed counsel's duties of representation do not cease when he files a motion to withdraw; counsel must continue to "act with competence, commitment and dedication to the interest of the client" until the court of appeals grants the motion). Accordingly, no new attorney will be appointed for appellant at this time. We further order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on appellant, his counsel, the attorney for the State, and the clerk of the trial court.

/s/_________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 22nd day of June, 2016.

/s/_________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Garcia v. State

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Jun 22, 2016
No. 04-15-00771-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 22, 2016)
Case details for

Garcia v. State

Case Details

Full title:John David GARCIA, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

Date published: Jun 22, 2016

Citations

No. 04-15-00771-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 22, 2016)