From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garcia v. State

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION I
Nov 18, 2015
2015 Ark. App. 673 (Ark. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

No. CR-14-129

11-18-2015

RENE GARCIA APPELLANT v. STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE

Joseph C. Self, for appellant. Leslie Rutledge, Att'y Gen., by: Evelyn D. Gomez, Ass't Att'y Gen., for appellee.


APPEAL FROM THE WASHINGTON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
[NO. CR-12-1865-1]
HONORABLE WILLIAM A. STOREY, JUDGE AFFIRMED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED WAYMOND M. BROWN, Judge

A Washington County jury found appellant Rene Garcia guilty of two counts of rape of a girl who was thirteen years old at the time of the offenses. He was sentenced to a total of seventy years' imprisonment; however, twenty years were suspended. Appellant's counsel has filed a motion to withdraw and a no-merit brief pursuant to Anders v. California and Rule 4-3(k) of the Rules of the Arkansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals. The clerk of this court provided appellant with a copy of counsel's brief and motion, and notified appellant of his right to file pro se points for reversal. Appellant has filed pro se points for reversal, and the State has filed a response. We affirm appellant's convictions and grant counsel's motion to withdraw.

386 U.S. 738 (1967).

A request to be relieved as counsel on the ground that the appeal is wholly without merit shall be accompanied by a brief including an abstract and addendum. The brief shall contain an argument section that consists of a list of all rulings adverse to the defendant made by the trial court with an explanation as to why each adverse ruling is not a meritorious ground for reversal. It is imperative that counsel follow the appropriate procedure when filing a motion to withdraw as counsel. In furtherance of the goal of protecting constitutional rights, it is both the duty of counsel and of this court to perform a full examination of the proceedings as a whole to decide if an appeal would be wholly frivolous.

Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-3(k)(1).

Id.

Brown v. State, 85 Ark. App. 382, 155 S.W.3d 22 (2004).

Campbell v. State, 74 Ark. App. 277, 47 S.W.3d 915 (2001).

From our review of the record, the brief presented to us, and appellant's pro se points for reversal, we hold that counsel has complied with Rule 4-3(k)(1) and agree that there is no merit to an appeal. Therefore, we affirm, by memorandum opinion, appellant's convictions. We also grant counsel's motion to withdraw.

See In re Memorandum Opinions, 16 Ark. App. 301, 700 S.W.2d 63 (1985).

Affirmed; motion to withdraw granted.

GLOVER and WHITEAKER, JJ., agree.

Joseph C. Self, for appellant.

Leslie Rutledge, Att'y Gen., by: Evelyn D. Gomez, Ass't Att'y Gen., for appellee.


Summaries of

Garcia v. State

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION I
Nov 18, 2015
2015 Ark. App. 673 (Ark. Ct. App. 2015)
Case details for

Garcia v. State

Case Details

Full title:RENE GARCIA APPELLANT v. STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE

Court:ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION I

Date published: Nov 18, 2015

Citations

2015 Ark. App. 673 (Ark. Ct. App. 2015)

Citing Cases

Garcia v. State

In October 2013, appellant Rene Garcia was convicted of two counts of rape involving a thirteen-year-old girl…

Flowers v. State

Id.Garcia v. State , 2015 Ark. App. 673, 2015 WL…