From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garcia v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Dec 3, 2014
151 So. 3d 1274 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. 2D13–6251.

2014-12-3

Sonny GARCIA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; Edward J. Volz, Jr., Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Richard P. Albertine, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Gillian N. Leytham, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; Edward J. Volz, Jr., Judge.
Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Richard P. Albertine, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Gillian N. Leytham, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
MORRIS, Judge.

Sonny Garcia appeals the revocation of his sex offender probation for the offense of possession of child pornography and his resulting sentence of forty-eight months in prison. We affirm the revocation of his probation because there was competent, substantial evidence to support the trial court's finding that Garcia “intentional[ly] disregard[ed] ... the GPS monitoring rules,” constituting a willful and substantial violation of probation. Correa v. State, 43 So.3d 738, 745 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (noting that “noncompliance with the rules [that] results from equipment problems or the subject's unintentional failure to operate the equipment properly ... does not rise to the level of a willful and substantial violation of probation” but that “intentional disregard of the GPS monitoring rules, tampering with the equipment, or actual violations of curfew or other activity restrictionswill generally amount to willful and substantial violations”); see also State v. Carter, 835 So.2d 259, 262 (Fla.2002) (“The trial court is in a better position to identify the probation violator's motive, intent, and attitude and assess whether the violation is both willful and substantial.”).

Affirmed. DAVIS, C.J., and LaROSE, J., Concur.


Summaries of

Garcia v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Dec 3, 2014
151 So. 3d 1274 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

Garcia v. State

Case Details

Full title:Sonny GARCIA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Date published: Dec 3, 2014

Citations

151 So. 3d 1274 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

Citing Cases

Douglas v. State

The State contends that the trial court correctly concluded that Douglas willfully and substantially violated…