From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garcia v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
May 15, 2013
No. 61660 (Nev. May. 15, 2013)

Opinion

No. 61660

05-15-2013

ROBIN ULISES GARCIA, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is an appeal from a district court order denying appellant Robin Ulises Garcia's post-conviction motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Janet J. Berry, Judge.

Garcia contends that the district court erred by denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Garcia claims that his plea was not entered knowingly and intelligently because he was not informed that his guilty plea to an aggravated felony subjected him to mandatory deportation. See 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii) ("Any alien who is convicted of an aggravated felony at any time after admission is deportable."); 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(F); see also Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. ____, ____, 130 S. Ct. 1473, 1483 (2010); United States v. Bonilla, 637 F.3d 980, 984 (9th Cir. 2011). We disagree with Garcia's contention.

Garcia pleaded guilty to one count of felony coercion. The district court imposed a probationary term not to exceed 5 years with an underlying sentence of 18-48 months.

A district court may grant a post-conviction motion to withdraw a guilty plea in order to "correct manifest injustice." NRS 176.165; see also Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59-60 (1985); Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984); Rubio v. State, 124 Nev. 1032, 1039-40, 194 P.3d 1224, 1228-29 (2008). Here, the district court conducted a hearing on the motion and heard arguments from counsel; however, as the district court noted, Garcia "called no witnesses and submitted no affidavits." Garcia was not present at the hearing due to his apparent deportation and his former defense counsel was not called to testify. As a result, the district court determined that Garcia "failed to meet his burden of showing that his defense counsel was ineffective" and denied the motion. We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Garcia's motion to withdraw his guilty plea, see Bryant v. State, 102 Nev. 268, 272, 721 P.2d 364, 368 (1986), and we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

_______________, J.

Gibbons

_______________, J.
Douglas
_______________, J.
Saitta
cc: Hon. Janet J. Berry, District Judge

Ian E. Silverberg

Attorney General/Carson City

Washoe County District Attorney

Washoe District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Garcia v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
May 15, 2013
No. 61660 (Nev. May. 15, 2013)
Case details for

Garcia v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROBIN ULISES GARCIA, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: May 15, 2013

Citations

No. 61660 (Nev. May. 15, 2013)